Introduction

Infidelity is not just a disagreement about sexual or romantic behavior. For many couples, it shakes the basic assumptions the relationship was built on: honesty, loyalty, safety, exclusivity, and the belief that each partner is living in the same reality.

That is one reason resentment after infidelity can feel so intense and last so long.

The betrayed partner is not only upset about something painful that happened. They may also be struggling with the realization that the person they trusted most was keeping something important from them. Memories can suddenly look different. Moments that once seemed happy may become confusing. The betrayed partner may start wondering whether past affection was real, what else they might not know, and whether they can trust their own judgment anymore.

Researchers who study relationship injuries often describe resentment through related ideas such as unforgiveness, avoidance, revenge, distrust, and rumination. These terms are not exactly the same, but together they help explain why resentment can become such a powerful force after betrayal.

At first, resentment may serve a purpose. It can remind the betrayed partner that something serious happened. It can stop them from minimizing the betrayal or becoming vulnerable again too quickly.

The problem begins when resentment stops being a temporary response to pain and starts becoming the way the relationship functions.

At that point, the couple may still be together, but emotionally they can remain stuck inside the betrayal.

Why Infidelity Can Create Such Lasting Resentment

Most relationship conflicts happen inside an existing foundation of trust.

A couple might fight about money, parenting, chores, family, or communication while still believing they basically know who the other person is.

Infidelity can shake that foundation itself.

The American Psychological Association describes betrayal as an act that violates a partner's expectations about trust and concern for their well-being. Infidelity is especially damaging because secrecy is often part of what happened.24

That means the betrayed partner may be trying to solve two problems at once.

The first is emotional:

“How do I cope with what happened?”

The second is about reality and trust:

“How do I know what is true now?”

That second question is especially important when it comes to resentment.

Before the betrayal, reassurance from a partner may have been enough. Afterward, the same person giving reassurance is also the person whose earlier words turned out not to be fully reliable.

Statements like “nothing else happened,” “you don't need to worry,” or “I would never do that again” may no longer feel reassuring in the way they once did.

Trust usually cannot be restored simply by asking the betrayed partner to believe again.

It has to be rebuilt through experience.

Research on affair recovery repeatedly highlights truth, communication, safety, trust, and consistent behavior as important parts of healing. One study of betrayed partners found that recovery was not a smooth, steady process. People often moved back and forth between feeling connected and disconnected. They described needing honest conversations, clarity about what happened, rebuilt trust, and some way of dealing with the feeling that the relationship had become unfair.131423

This helps explain why resentment can continue even after the affair itself has ended.

The affair may be over.

But the meaning of the affair—and the question of whether the relationship is actually safe now—may still be unresolved.

The Emotional Impact on the Betrayed Partner

After discovering infidelity, many betrayed partners experience a mix of anger, sadness, disbelief, anxiety, jealousy, humiliation, grief, and confusion.

Some also experience intrusive thoughts, trouble sleeping, constant questioning, difficulty concentrating, emotional numbness, or strong reactions to reminders of what happened.

These reactions should not automatically be called PTSD. Infidelity by itself usually does not meet the standard definition required for a PTSD diagnosis.

Still, research shows that some people can experience serious trauma-like symptoms after a relationship betrayal.

A 2019 study of 73 unmarried young adults who had experienced a partner's infidelity found that 45.2% scored in a range suggesting probable infidelity-related PTSD. Because the study involved a small and specific group, that number should not be applied to everyone. Still, those with stronger post-traumatic stress symptoms also tended to have poorer psychological health.2

Other research has found similar patterns. People often describe betrayal as deeply destabilizing, and a more recent review found that severe relationship stressors such as infidelity can be linked with significant post-traumatic stress symptoms, even though the research is still developing.34

Resentment can become tangled up with this distress.

The betrayed partner may replay what happened, look for signs they missed, reconstruct timelines, compare themselves with the other person, or imagine scenes they never saw.

In many cases, the mind is trying to make sense of something that once seemed impossible.

But the same process that is meant to create understanding can also keep the pain active.

Rumination: What Keeps Resentment Going

One of the clearest findings in research on betrayal and forgiveness is the connection between rumination and ongoing resentment.

Rumination is more than simply remembering what happened.

It means repeatedly returning to the betrayal—why it happened, how unfair it was, what it means, what should have happened instead—without ever reaching a sense of resolution.

Long-term studies have found that when rumination increases, forgiveness tends to decrease, largely because rumination keeps anger active.6

Research with married couples shows a similar pattern. Rumination and empathy both appear to influence forgiveness, and forgiveness is closely connected to the overall quality of the relationship.5

This does not mean the betrayed partner should simply stop thinking about the betrayal.

Early on, questions and repeated conversations may be necessary.

The important difference is between processing and getting stuck.

Processing slowly leads to more clarity:

What happened?

What does it mean?

What has changed?

What do I need now?

Rumination keeps circling the same questions while producing the same emotional pain.

When resentment and rumination feed each other, a difficult cycle can develop.

The betrayed partner remembers what happened, becomes angry, interprets current behavior through the betrayal, feels unsafe, looks for more evidence, notices something unclear, and returns to the betrayal again.

Over time, even ordinary events can start to feel threatening.

A late text message may look suspicious.

A distracted expression may feel like emotional distance.

A work trip may bring back memories of secrecy.

The betrayed partner's mind is essentially saying:

“The last time I assumed everything was okay, I was wrong.”

Resentment Changes the Meaning of Everyday Arguments

One of the hardest parts of unresolved resentment is that the betrayal does not stay limited to conversations about the betrayal.

Imagine the couple argues because one partner is late.

Before the affair, the argument might simply mean:

“You were inconsiderate.”

After the affair, the same argument might carry another message underneath it:

“Once again, your needs matter more than mine.”

An unanswered message may no longer feel like forgetfulness.

It may feel like:

“You're hiding something again.”

A disagreement about money might turn into:

“You already broke our trust, and now you expect me to trust your judgment.”

The original betrayal begins to shape the meaning of unrelated situations.

This creates a major problem.

One partner may believe they are arguing about what is happening today.

The other may feel they are arguing about today and everything the betrayal represented.

Small conflicts can suddenly feel enormous because they are connected to a much larger wound.

Research on forgiveness and relationship conflict helps explain this. Retaliation and avoidance after a serious relationship offense are linked with poorer conflict resolution. More forgiving responses are generally linked with better conflict resolution.78

Other research has found that forgiveness is connected with greater relationship satisfaction partly because it reduces negative conflict and encourages more effort toward the relationship.9

That does not mean the betrayed partner is required to forgive.

It means that when resentment repeatedly leads to punishment, withdrawal, retaliation, or hostile conflict, the original betrayal can begin creating new injuries on top of the first one.

The Pursue–Defend Cycle

A very common pattern after infidelity happens when one partner keeps seeking information or reassurance while the other becomes defensive or pulls away.

The betrayed partner may ask questions like:

Why did you do it?

Are you still thinking about that person?

How do I know you're telling me everything?

Why did you tell them things you never told me?

Did you love them?

Are you actually sorry, or are you just sorry you got caught?

At first, the unfaithful partner may answer again and again.

Eventually, they may start feeling like the conversations will never end. They may feel ashamed, overwhelmed, frustrated, or defensive.

So they withdraw.

Unfortunately, that withdrawal can be exactly what makes the betrayed partner feel even more unsafe.

The betrayed partner may see the withdrawal as a sign that something is still being hidden or that their pain no longer matters.

So they push harder.

The unfaithful partner feels even more pressure and pulls away even more.

Research on couples with histories of affairs has found similar demand-and-withdraw patterns. These patterns can be especially strong when the affair has not been fully disclosed.10

The larger point is that secrecy, questioning, defensiveness, and withdrawal can start feeding one another.

Neither partner may feel like they are creating the problem.

The betrayed partner feels like they are trying to feel safe.

The unfaithful partner feels like they are trying to escape an interaction that never seems to end.

Both reactions can make sense from each person's point of view.

But together, they can keep the couple trapped.

What Resentment Does to the Unfaithful Partner

Resentment does not only affect the betrayed partner.

Over time, it also changes the emotional position of the person who was unfaithful.

In a healthy repair process, guilt can lead to responsibility:

“I did something harmful. I understand that I hurt you, and I need to behave differently.”

Shame can feel very different:

“I am a terrible person. Nothing I do can ever repair this.”

When conversations become permanently punishing, the unfaithful partner may shift from remorse into shame, defensiveness, hopelessness, or even resentment of their own.

They may start thinking:

Nothing I do will ever be enough.

I'm going to be punished forever.

Every disagreement becomes about the affair.

My partner says they want to rebuild, but they will never see me as anything other than the person who cheated.

None of this removes responsibility for the betrayal.

It describes another problem that can develop afterward.

Eventually, the unfaithful partner may stop entering difficult conversations with empathy and begin experiencing them as attacks they have to survive.

Apologies can become automatic.

Questions can produce irritation instead of compassion.

Transparency may start to feel like permanent surveillance.

A partner who originally wanted to repair the relationship may begin emotionally withdrawing.

The couple can then become stuck between two painful positions.

The betrayed partner thinks:

“You want me to move on from something you still do not fully understand.”

The unfaithful partner thinks:

“You will never allow me to become anything other than the person who did this.”

Repair requires finding a way to hold the unfaithful partner responsible for what happened without permanently defining either person by the moment of betrayal.

Resentment, Power, and the Feeling of “You Owe Me”

Infidelity creates a real imbalance.

One person broke an agreement.

The other did not.

That difference matters.

Trying to immediately say that both partners are equally responsible for the affair can make resentment worse.

There may have been relationship problems before the infidelity, and both partners may eventually need to look honestly at those problems.

But responsibility for choosing deception or breaking an agreed boundary belongs to the person who made that choice.

At the same time, that imbalance can eventually create another problem.

The betrayed partner may begin to feel entitled to more access, more control, more explanations, more decision-making power, or exceptions from the usual rules of the relationship.

Some temporary imbalance can make sense during repair.

For example, increased transparency may help rebuild safety.

But it is very difficult for a relationship to survive permanently as a debtor-creditor arrangement.

Research on couples who remained together after infidelity found that reconciliation often involved changes in the balance of power, along with forgiveness, counseling, managing painful memories, and making new meaning from what happened.12

Eventually, the relationship has to move from:

“You owe me forever”

toward:

“What would make this relationship safe, fair, and willingly chosen now?”

Without that change, resentment can turn into permanent control.

Resentment Can Also Harm the Betrayed Partner

Resentment is often discussed as something that damages the relationship.

But it can also keep the betrayed partner emotionally connected to the injury.

Research involving people who experienced infidelity has linked negative interpretations, blame, anxiety, depression, emotional distress, and post-betrayal stress.11

One study of 232 recently betrayed college students found that more negative interpretations of the infidelity were connected with psychological distress, which in turn was associated with behaviors that could affect health. The results varied by gender, and the study involved a limited population, so the findings should not be applied too broadly.

Still, the pattern points to an important problem.

At first, resentment may say:

“I will not let what happened be minimized.”

Over time, it can become:

“I have to keep emotionally reliving what happened in order to prove that it mattered.”

Healing does not mean deciding that the betrayal was acceptable.

It means reaching a point where the betrayal can still matter without continuing to control the betrayed partner's emotional life.

When Resentment Protects You—and When It Starts Causing Harm

Not all resentment is unhealthy.

Telling a betrayed partner to stop being angry too quickly can actually interfere with healing.

Anger can help identify broken boundaries.

It can expose minimization.

It can prevent a rushed reconciliation.

It can demand accountability.

In that sense, resentment can act like a guard protecting the boundary where trust was broken.

The real question is whether that guard ever receives enough evidence that things have changed.

Resentment is more helpful when it leads to clearer boundaries, greater understanding, better decisions, and real changes in behavior.

It becomes more harmful when the relationship starts revolving around punishment, humiliation, constant monitoring, revenge, withholding affection, contempt, or the belief that nothing the unfaithful partner does can ever count as change.

The difference is not:

anger versus no anger.

The difference is:

movement versus staying stuck.

When healing is happening, resentment slowly changes.

The betrayal may still hurt, but conversations become less chaotic.

Questions begin to have answers.

Triggers become easier to handle.

Trust starts to depend more on what is happening now and less on fear from the past.

When resentment becomes destructive, nothing really changes.

The same conflict simply keeps repeating.

Forgiveness Is Often Misunderstood

Research on forgiveness is important when talking about resentment, but it is easy to misunderstand what forgiveness actually means.

Studies often find that forgiveness is connected with healthier relationship functioning.

Revenge and avoidance tend to be linked with more difficult conflict, while forgiveness tends to be linked with less negative conflict.

But forgiveness does not mean forgetting.

It does not mean excusing what happened.

It does not mean immediately trusting again.

It does not mean returning to the old relationship.

And it does not mean staying together.

Forgiveness also does not automatically help when there has been no real behavioral change.

One study of newly married couples found that forgiving harmful behavior was sometimes followed by more harmful behavior later.15

Other research suggests that forgiveness works differently when it is combined with clear efforts to require change and protect the relationship.16

In other words, forgiveness without boundaries can look very different from forgiveness with accountability.

That is especially important after infidelity.

The betrayed partner does not have to choose between holding resentment forever and immediately forgiving.

A healthier path may look more like this:

understand what happened, establish the truth, create boundaries, watch for accountability, rebuild safety, decide what the relationship should become, and allow forgiveness—if it comes—to develop from there.

Forgiveness is better understood as something that may come out of healing.

It should not be treated as something that must happen before healing can begin.

What Helps Resentment Fade?

Research on affair recovery points to several recurring conditions.

First, the betrayal itself has to stop.

Repair is extremely difficult while the affair, secret contact, deception, or hiding continues.

Safety cannot be rebuilt while the threat is still active.

Second, the betrayed partner usually needs a clear and believable understanding of what happened.

Research on affair recovery repeatedly highlights honest conversation, truth, meaning, and trust.1314

That does not necessarily mean every graphic detail has to be shared.

It means ongoing deception and carefully incomplete stories are not compatible with rebuilding trust.

Third, accountability needs to be separated from explanation.

Understanding why the affair happened may eventually be useful.

Loneliness, conflict, opportunity, weak boundaries, a need for validation, relationship dissatisfaction, major life changes, impulsivity, or other factors may have contributed.

But explanations stop being helpful when they are used to shift responsibility onto the betrayed partner.

“The relationship was struggling” is not the same as:

“You caused me to cheat.”

Fourth, empathy has to show up in behavior.

An apology matters.

But trust is usually rebuilt more through what happens afterward:

consistency, honesty, transparency, reliable behavior, clear boundaries, patience with triggers, and the absence of further deception.

Fifth, the couple eventually has to build a relationship that is about more than recovering from the affair.

If every conversation is about betrayal, the relationship has no space to become something new.

Reconnection also requires friendship, affection, shared goals, humor, cooperation, and experiences that are not only about what happened.

Finally, the betrayed partner needs to feel that staying is truly a choice.

Staying because of fear, financial dependence, shame, family pressure, or desperation is psychologically different from staying because the betrayed partner understands their options and chooses the relationship.

A large 2026 international study involving 5,233 people affected by infidelity found that treatment needs to pay close attention to the very different experiences of each partner rather than treating affair recovery as if every couple goes through the same process.21

Can Couples Actually Recover?

Yes.

But recovery does not necessarily mean returning to exactly what the relationship was before.

Several studies give reason for cautious hope.

An early treatment study involving six couples found reductions in emotional and relationship distress for most participants, along with increased forgiveness among betrayed partners.17

The study was very small, so the findings were only preliminary.

A larger study involving 145 couples dealing with infidelity and 385 couples seeking therapy for other reasons found that the infidelity group entered therapy with more distress and depression.19

But they continued to improve.

Six months later, their outcomes were not statistically different from the other couples, although missing data were an important limitation.

Another study randomly assigned 89 couples after a recently discovered affair to treatment conditions.18

Anxiety improved for both partners, and depression improved for the unfaithful partner.

However, about half the couples dropped out for reasons that included continuing affairs and separation, and relationship satisfaction did not improve enough for both partners.

More recent observational research involving 35 couples who completed Gottman Method Couples Therapy after infidelity found meaningful improvements in several relationship and psychological outcomes.22

Because the study was not a randomized comparison, it cannot prove that therapy itself caused all of the improvement.

More broadly, a 2020 review of 58 couple-therapy studies involving 2,092 couples found substantial improvements in relationship satisfaction, communication, emotional closeness, and partner behavior.20

Those studies were not all specifically about infidelity.

The research therefore supports neither hopelessness nor guarantees.

Some couples recover deeply.

Some stay together but remain resentful.

Some decide separation is healthier.

And some eventually describe the relationship after the affair as more honest and intentional than the one they had before.

That does not mean the infidelity was somehow good for the relationship.

It means the crisis sometimes forces issues, needs, assumptions, and patterns into the open.

The Most Important Question Is Not “Have You Forgiven Yet?”

One of the least helpful questions after infidelity is:

“Why aren't you over it?”

Time alone does not repair betrayal.

A better way to look at healing is to ask whether things are actually changing.

Is there less deception?

Is there more empathy?

Can the betrayed partner express pain without needing to destroy the other person?

Can the unfaithful partner hear that pain without immediately becoming defensive?

Are questions producing clarity instead of uncovering more lies?

Are boundaries becoming collaborative instead of controlling?

Are triggers becoming less intense?

Is trust starting to come from observable behavior?

Can the couple talk about the affair without every conversation ending in exactly the same place?

Is the betrayed partner regaining a sense of dignity and independence, whether or not the relationship survives?

Can the unfaithful partner take responsibility without becoming permanently trapped in shame?

And eventually, can both partners imagine a future that is bigger than what happened?

These questions tell us much more than whether resentment has simply disappeared.

They show whether resentment is slowly being transformed into understanding, boundaries, accountability, and choice.

Conclusion

Resentment after infidelity is not just anger that refuses to go away.

It often comes from broken trust, unanswered questions, lost safety, injustice, and the frightening realization that the person you trusted was capable of keeping an important reality from you.

At first, resentment may help the betrayed partner protect themselves.

It can stop them from minimizing what happened or trusting again too quickly.

But when resentment becomes tied to constant rumination, punishment, avoidance, surveillance, contempt, or permanent moral debt, it can begin creating a second injury on top of the first one.

The unfaithful partner has a particular responsibility early in the repair process:

stop the betrayal, tell the truth, accept the consequences, understand the harm, show empathy, and become trustworthy through consistent behavior instead of simply asking to be trusted.

The betrayed partner has a different task.

They do not need to forgive on demand.

Instead, they eventually have to decide whether the evidence in front of them points toward continued self-protection, careful rebuilding, or leaving.

A couple begins to recover when the betrayal no longer has to be denied or constantly relived.

The goal is not to forget.

It is to reach a point where what happened remains part of the relationship's history without controlling every interaction in the present.

Frequently asked questions

Why is resentment so strong after infidelity?

Infidelity can damage both emotional safety and a person’s confidence in what is true. Resentment may initially protect the betrayed partner from minimizing the injury or trusting again before there is enough evidence of change.

How does resentment affect a relationship after cheating?

Unresolved resentment can make ordinary disagreements carry the meaning of the betrayal. It may fuel rumination, punishment, withdrawal, surveillance, defensiveness, and a pursue–defend cycle that creates new injuries for both partners.

Can a relationship heal if the betrayed partner still feels resentful?

Yes. Resentment does not have to disappear before repair begins. Healing is more likely when the betrayal has ended, the truth is clear, boundaries are respected, empathy is visible in behavior, and trust grows from consistent evidence over time.

Does forgiveness mean excusing infidelity or staying together?

No. Forgiveness is not forgetting, excusing the betrayal, immediately trusting again, returning to the old relationship, or choosing to stay. If forgiveness develops, it can coexist with accountability, boundaries, and a decision to separate.

What are signs that resentment is beginning to heal?

Signs include less chaotic conversations, clearer answers, fewer new deceptions, more empathy, triggers that are easier to manage, boundaries that feel collaborative rather than controlling, and a future that is no longer organized entirely around the affair.

Research references

  1. Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2009). Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: The Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS). Psychological Assessment, 21(2), 194–209. DOI 10.1037/a0016068.
  2. Roos, L. G., O'Connor, V., Canevello, A., & Bennett, J. M. (2019). Post-traumatic stress and psychological health following infidelity in unmarried young adults. Stress and Health, 35(4), 468–479. DOI 10.1002/smi.2880.
  3. Lonergan, M., Brunet, A., Rivest-Beauregard, M., & Groleau, D. (2021). Is romantic partner betrayal a form of traumatic experience? A qualitative study. Stress and Health, 37(1), 19–31. DOI 10.1002/smi.2968.
  4. The Impact of Non-Criterion A Traumas in Intimate Relationships on Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms: A Systematic Review. (2025).
  5. Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. (2005). Marital quality, forgiveness, empathy, and rumination: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 368–378. DOI 10.1177/0146167204271597.
  6. McCullough, M. E., et al. (2007). Rumination, emotion, and forgiveness: Three longitudinal studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 490–505. DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.490.
  7. Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2004). Forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(1), 72–81. DOI 10.1037/0893-3200.18.1.72.
  8. Fincham, F. D., Beach, S. R. H., & Davila, J. (2007). Longitudinal relations between forgiveness and conflict resolution in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(3), 542–545. DOI 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.542.
  9. Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Forgiveness and relationship satisfaction: Mediating mechanisms. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(4), 551–559. DOI 10.1037/a0024526.
  10. Balderrama-Durbin, C. M., Allen, E. S., & Rhoades, G. K. (2012). Demand and withdraw behaviors in couples with a history of infidelity. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(1), 11–17. DOI 10.1037/a0026756.
  11. Shrout, M. R., & Weigel, D. J. (2018). Infidelity's aftermath: Appraisals, mental health, and health-compromising behaviors following a partner's infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(8), 1067–1091. DOI 10.1177/0265407517704091.
  12. Abrahamson, I., Hussain, R., Khan, A., & Schofield, M. J. (2012). What helps couples rebuild their relationship after infidelity? Journal of Family Issues, 33(11), 1494–1519. DOI 10.1177/0192513X11424257.
  13. Mitchell, E. A., Wittenborn, A. K., Timm, T. M., & Blow, A. J. (2022). Affair recovery: Exploring similarities and differences of injured and involved partners. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 48(2), 447–463. DOI 10.1111/jmft.12538.
  14. Walravens, G., & Rober, P. (2024). Relational recovery after infidelity as a dual process: A model based on the experiences of female injured partners. Family Process, 63, 151–162. DOI 10.1111/famp.12857.
  15. McNulty, J. K. (2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(6), 787–790. DOI 10.1037/a0021678.
  16. McNulty, J. K., et al. (2018). “You're forgiven, but don't do it again!” Direct partner regulation buffers the costs of forgiveness.
  17. Gordon, K. C., Baucom, D. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2004). An integrative intervention for promoting recovery from extramarital affairs. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30(2), 213–231. DOI 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2004.tb01235.x.
  18. Kröger, C., Reißner, T., Vasterling, I., Schütz, K., & Kliem, S. (2012). Therapy for couples after an affair: A randomized-controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(12), 786–796. DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2012.09.006.
  19. Atkins, D. C., Marín, R. A., Lo, T. T. Y., Klann, N., & Hahlweg, K. (2010). Outcomes of couples with infidelity in a community-based sample of couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(2), 212–216. DOI 10.1037/a0018789.
  20. Roddy, M. K., Walsh, L. M., Rothman, K., Hatch, S. G., & Doss, B. D. (2020). Meta-analysis of couple therapy: Effects across outcomes, designs, timeframes, and other moderators. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 88(7), 583–596. DOI 10.1037/ccp0000514.
  21. Irvine, T. J., & Peluso, P. R. (2026). Client-Centered Perspectives on Couple Therapy for Infidelity From an International Mixed-Methods Survey. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 52(1), e70112. DOI 10.1111/jmft.70112.
  22. Peluso, P. R., Irvine, T., & Marquez, A. (2026). Couples satisfaction, relationship status, and symptom change after Gottman Method Couples Therapy for infidelity: A dyadic analysis. Psychotherapy Research. DOI 10.1080/10503307.2026.2689634.
  23. American Psychological Association. (2026). How psychologists help patients heal from infidelity. Monitor on Psychology, 57(5).
  24. American Psychological Association. APA Dictionary of Psychology: Betrayal.
How Do I Release Resentment After Betrayal Without Minimizing What They Did? Can a Marriage Be Healthy Again After Infidelity? How to Move On After Infidelity Without Suppressing Your Grief Is Your Partner Doing Their Part in Affair Recovery?